Low-Power Logic Styles: CMOS Versus Pass-Transistor Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recently reported logic style comparisons based on full-adder circuits claimed complementary pass-transistor logic (CPL) to be much more power-efficient than complementary CMOS. However, new comparisons performed on more efficient CMOS circuit realizations and a wider range of different logic cells, as well as the use of realistic circuit arrangements demonstrate CMOS to be superior to CPL in most cases with respect to speed, area, power dissipation, and power-delay products. An implemented 32-b adder using complementary CMOS has a power-delay product of less than half that of the CPL version. Robustness with respect to voltage scaling and transistor sizing, as well as generality and ease-of-use, are additional advantages of CMOS logic gates, especially when cell-based design and logic synthesis are targeted. This paper shows that complementary CMOS is the logic style of choice for the implementation of arbitrary combinational circuits if low voltage, low power, and small power-delay products are of concern.
منابع مشابه
Performance evaluation of the CMOS Full adders in TDK 90 nm Technology
This paper presents power analysis of the full adder cells reported as having a low PDP (Power Delay Product), by means of speed, power consumption and area. These full adders were designed upon various logic styles to derive the sum and carry outputs. Two new high-speed and low-power full adder cells designed with an alternative internal logic structure and pass-transistor logic styles that le...
متن کاملComparison between nMos Pass Transistor logic style vs. CMOS Complementary Cells
This paper compares three different logic styles for implementing arbitrary Boolean functions of upto three inputs in terms of their layout area, delay and power dissipation. The three styles are nMOS pass transistor based design, NAND gate based design, and CMOS complementary logic design. Results of the comparison show that pass transistor based design is superior to NAND based design, but lo...
متن کاملDesign of Power-Efficient Digital Circuits Using Gate-Diffusion Input (GDI) Technique in CMOS Process
in this paper Gate diffusion input (GDI) technique of Low-power digital circuit design is described and verified in 0.18μm CMOS process. This technique permits reducing power consumption, propagation delay, and area of digital circuits of logic design. Performance comparison with traditional CMOS and pass-transistor logic design techniques is presented. These methods are compared with respect t...
متن کاملDesign Analysis of XOR Gates Using CMOS & Pass Transistor Logic
This paper compares two different logic styles based on 45 nm technology for implementing logic gates of upto two inputs in terms of their layout area, delay and power dissipation. The XOR gate has been implemented & designed using CMOS & Pass Transistor logic on 45 nm technology .The schematic of proposed gate has been designed & simulated by using DSCH3& its equivalent layout has been develop...
متن کاملLeakage Power Analysis and Comparison of Deep Submicron Logic Gates
Basic combinational gates, including NAND, NOR and XOR, are fundamental building blocks in CMOS digital circuits. This paper analyses and compares the power consumption due to transistor leakage of low-order and high-order basic logic gates. The NAND and NOR gates have been designed using different design styles and circuit topologies, including complementary CMOS, partitioned logic and complem...
متن کامل